Hardaway - Complaint 10.13.2022
Hardaway v. James is one of seven civil rights cases against the New York so-called “Concealed Carry Improvements Act” (“CCIA”). It focuses its attack against the unconstitutionality of “any place of worship or religious observation” as a “sensitive location” where no one otherwise permitted may concealed carry a handgun.
The Complaint is where a case begins. This document lays out the causes of action, the factual allegations, the good guys and the bad. It’s the elements of what the plaintiffs must ultimately prove to win declaratory relief to strike down the offensive statutory provision.
This case is now concluded by Judgment, accompanied by a written stipulation of the parties. The document is available HERE.
Hardaway v. James is one of seven civil rights cases against the New York so-called “Concealed Carry Improvements Act” (“CCIA”). It focuses its attack against the unconstitutionality of “any place of worship or religious observation” as a “sensitive location” where no one otherwise permitted may concealed carry a handgun.
The Complaint is where a case begins. This document lays out the causes of action, the factual allegations, the good guys and the bad. It’s the elements of what the plaintiffs must ultimately prove to win declaratory relief to strike down the offensive statutory provision.
This case is now concluded by Judgment, accompanied by a written stipulation of the parties. The document is available HERE.
Hardaway v. James is one of seven civil rights cases against the New York so-called “Concealed Carry Improvements Act” (“CCIA”). It focuses its attack against the unconstitutionality of “any place of worship or religious observation” as a “sensitive location” where no one otherwise permitted may concealed carry a handgun.
The Complaint is where a case begins. This document lays out the causes of action, the factual allegations, the good guys and the bad. It’s the elements of what the plaintiffs must ultimately prove to win declaratory relief to strike down the offensive statutory provision.
This case is now concluded by Judgment, accompanied by a written stipulation of the parties. The document is available HERE.
STATUS: the State has not yet answered this Complaint. (Rev. 05.09.2024.)
